Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 10, 2025

Renois v. WVMF Funding, LLC

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:20-cv-09281
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
DiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

Renois v. WVME Funding: Judge Figueredo scheduled a conference on a motion to compel and required a separate motion to seal exhibits.

Who this affects

The order affects Marianne Renois, the Estate of Ellis DeAngelo, WVME Funding, LLC, and Compu-Link Corporation doing business as Celink by setting deadlines and a conference concerning the motion to compel and the request to seal exhibits.

What happened

In Renois v. WVME Funding, LLC, the plaintiff filed a motion to compel, identified as ECF No. 128, and asked to file certain exhibits under seal.

The court scheduled a conference about the motion to compel for April 10, 2025, and directed the defendant to respond by April 3, 2025. The court also required the plaintiff to file a motion to seal, supporting memorandum, and unredacted exhibits under a temporary seal by April 3.

Judge Valerie Figueredo issued the order on March 10, 2025. The order addressed scheduling, the response deadline, and the sealing procedure; it did not decide the merits of the motion to compel.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Renois v. WVMF Funding, LLC · No. 1:20-cv-09281
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 10, 2025

Background

Marianne Renois, identified in the caption as the administrator, fiduciary, and beneficiary of and for the Estate of Ellis DeAngelo, sued WVME Funding, LLC, and Compu-Link Corporation doing business as Celink. The order concerns the plaintiff's motion to compel at ECF No. 128 and her request to file certain exhibits under seal.

Court's actions

The court scheduled a conference about the motion to compel for Thursday, April 10, 2025, at 10 a.m. It directed the defendant to respond to the motion by Thursday, April 3, 2025.

Regarding the request to file exhibits under seal, the court directed the plaintiff to file a motion to seal, a memorandum explaining why the documents should be permanently sealed under the standard described in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, and unredacted versions of the exhibits under a provisional seal. Those filings were due April 3, 2025.

Disposition and effect

Judge Valerie Figueredo entered the order scheduling the conference and setting filing deadlines. The order did not grant or deny the motion to compel, and it did not make a final ruling on sealing the exhibits. It is a procedural order concerning discovery and court filings.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.