Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 13, 2025

Bradley v. City of Philadelphia

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-08206
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Bradley v. City of Philadelphia, Judge Swain barred Aisha Bradley from filing future fee-free civil cases in this court without permission.

Who this affects

Aisha Bradley is barred from filing future civil actions without paying filing fees in the Southern District of New York unless she first obtains permission from the court. The order also affects any future filing she submits there and warns that further frivolous documents could result in additional sanctions.

What happened

In Bradley v. City of Philadelphia, Aisha Bradley filed a case without a lawyer and without paying filing fees. She named 50 defendants, most or all of whom were in Pennsylvania, over events in that state.

The court had already dismissed the case without prejudice because venue was improper and declined to transfer it. The court ordered Bradley to explain why it should not restrict her future fee-free filings, but she did not submit the required declaration.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain barred Bradley from filing future civil cases without paying filing fees in this court unless she first obtains permission. The court closed the case, entered judgment, and denied fee-free status for any appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bradley v. City of Philadelphia · No. 1:24-cv-08206
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Feb. 13, 2025

Background

Aisha Bradley, who lives in Pennsylvania, filed this action without a lawyer and asked to proceed without paying filing fees. She named 50 defendants, most or all of whom were in Pennsylvania, concerning events that occurred there.

In an order dated November 12, 2024, the court dismissed the action without prejudice because venue was improper. It declined to transfer the case because Bradley had a history of filing, and attempting to transfer, cases in this court concerning events in Pennsylvania despite warnings that venue was improper. The court also ordered Bradley to show cause within 30 days why it should not restrict her future fee-free filings in this court. Bradley did not file the required declaration. The court had previously denied her motion to withdraw the action because the complaint had already been dismissed.

Ruling

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1651, the court barred Bradley from filing future civil actions without paying filing fees in the Southern District of New York unless she first obtains the court's permission. Any request for permission must include a proposed complaint and a copy of the bar order, and must be filed with the court's Pro Se Intake Unit. The court stated that an action filed without first requesting permission will be dismissed for failure to comply with the order.

The court also warned that continued submission of frivolous documents could lead to additional sanctions, including monetary penalties. It directed the Clerk of Court to close the action, terminate the pending motions, and enter judgment. The court certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.