Kenyatta v. Jimenez
- Laura Swain
- 1:25-cv-01988
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 5
In Kenyatta v. Jimenez, Judge Swain ordered payment or an application to proceed without prepaying fees within 30 days.
Charles Kenyatta, Jr., an incarcerated plaintiff representing himself, must either pay the required fees or submit the required application and prisoner authorization for his case to proceed.
What happened
Charles Kenyatta, Jr. sued Dayris Jimenez, but he did not submit the required filing fees, application to proceed without prepaying fees, or prisoner authorization.
The court gave Kenyatta 30 days to either pay $405 or submit the required application and authorization. No summons will issue yet, and the case will be dismissed if he does not comply.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied fee-free status for any appeal from this order, finding that such an appeal would not be taken in good faith.
The detailed version
- Kenyatta v. Jimenez · No. 1:25-cv-01988
- Laura Swain
- Mar. 13, 2025
Background
Charles Kenyatta, Jr., who is incarcerated at Collins Correctional Facility, filed this civil action without a filing-fee payment, a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees, or a prisoner authorization. He is representing himself.
Court’s order
The court ordered Kenyatta, within 30 days of the order, to do one of two things: pay $405 in fees, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee, or submit the attached application to proceed without prepaying fees and prisoner authorization. If the court grants the application, the $350 filing fee must still be collected in installments from his account under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. The prisoner authorization permits deductions and requires certified account statements for the previous six months.
No summons will issue at this time. If Kenyatta complies, the Clerk’s Office will process the case under its procedures. If he does not comply within the allowed period, the action will be dismissed.
Appeal and caution
The court certified that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore denied fee-free status for an appeal. The order also cautioned that a later dismissal for being frivolous, malicious, or failing to state a claim could count as a statutory “strike” affecting a prisoner’s ability to proceed without prepaying fees in future federal civil actions.
Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.