Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 14, 2025

Rodriguez v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-09623
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Rodriguez v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility, Judge Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice after Rodriguez failed to pay fees or submit required forms.

Who this affects

Rodriguez's complaint was dismissed without prejudice because Rodriguez did not submit the required fee-waiver materials or pay the filing fees. The order also denied fee-waiver status for an appeal.

What happened

In Rodriguez v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility, the court had ordered Rodriguez to submit an application to proceed without paying filing fees, a prisoner authorization, or the required filing fees within 30 days.

Rodriguez did not submit the application or prisoner authorization and did not pay the fees. The court therefore dismissed the complaint without prejudice, meaning it may be filed again.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied permission to appeal without paying fees, finding that any appeal would not be taken in good faith, and directed the clerk to enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rodriguez v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility · No. 1:24-cv-09623
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 14, 2025

Background

By an order dated December 18, 2024, the court directed Rodriguez to do one of two things within 30 days: submit a completed application to proceed without paying filing fees, along with a prisoner authorization, or pay the $405 required to file a civil action in the court. The order warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal.

Court’s Ruling

Rodriguez did not submit the application or prisoner authorization and did not pay the filing fees. The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice, meaning the dismissal did not bar a later filing. The court cited 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying fees. The court directed the clerk to enter judgment. Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.