Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 14, 2025

Callaghan v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-09611
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Callaghan v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility, Judge Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice because Callaghan neither paid filing fees nor submitted required forms.

Who this affects

The dismissal affected Shakeem Callaghan's complaint against Otis Bantum Correctional Facility and the other defendants. Because the dismissal was without prejudice, the opinion states that it did not bar refiling. The court also denied fee-free status for any appeal.

What happened

In Callaghan v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility, the court had ordered Callaghan to submit a completed request to proceed without paying the filing fee or pay the required $405 in fees within 30 days.

Callaghan did neither. He did not submit the required request, prisoner authorization, or filing fees, so the court dismissed the complaint without prejudice, meaning the dismissal did not bar refiling.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Callaghan permission to proceed without paying fees on appeal. The court directed the clerk to enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Callaghan v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility · No. 1:24-cv-09611
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 14, 2025

Background

On December 18, 2024, the court directed Shakeem Callaghan to submit a completed application to proceed without paying the filing fee, along with prisoner authorization, or to pay the $405 required to file a civil action. The order warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal.

Ruling

Callaghan did not submit the application or prisoner authorization and did not pay the filing fees. The court therefore dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal. Finally, it directed the clerk to enter judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.