Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 14, 2025

Feliz v. Otis Bantum Correctional Center

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-09618
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Feliz v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility: Judge Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice after Feliz neither paid filing fees nor submitted required forms.

Who this affects

Kevin Feliz’s complaint was dismissed without prejudice because he did not submit the required fee-waiver materials or pay the filing fees. The court also denied fee-free status for an appeal.

What happened

In Kevin Feliz v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility, et al., the court had ordered Kevin Feliz to submit a request to proceed without paying filing fees or pay $405 in filing fees within thirty days. The order warned that failing to do so would result in dismissal.

Feliz did not submit the required request, the required prisoner authorization, or the filing fees. The opinion does not address the underlying allegations in his complaint.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice and directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment. She also denied fee-free status for any appeal, stating that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Feliz v. Otis Bantum Correctional Center · No. 1:24-cv-09618
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 14, 2025

Background

In an order dated December 18, 2024, the court directed Kevin Feliz to either submit a completed application to proceed without paying filing fees, called an in forma pauperis (IFP) application, along with prisoner authorization, or pay the $405 required to file a civil action. The court gave him thirty days and warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal.

Ruling

The court found that Feliz had not submitted an IFP application or prisoner authorization and had not paid the filing fees. It therefore dismissed the complaint without prejudice. The opinion does not decide the underlying claims.

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal. It also directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment. Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.