Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 14, 2025

Soto v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-09624
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Soto v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility, Judge Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice after Soto neither paid fees nor filed required forms.

Who this affects

Frank Soto's complaint was dismissed without prejudice because he did not submit the required filing forms or pay the filing fees. The court also denied permission to appeal without paying fees.

What happened

In Soto v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility, the court had ordered Frank Soto to file an application to proceed without paying the filing fees or pay the required fees within 30 days.

Soto did not file the required application and prisoner authorization, and he did not pay the fees. The opinion does not address the underlying claims.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice, directed the clerk to enter judgment, and denied Soto permission to appeal without paying fees because the appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Soto v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility · No. 1:24-cv-09624
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 14, 2025

Background

On December 18, 2024, the court ordered Frank Soto to submit, within 30 days, a completed application to proceed without paying the filing fee, along with prisoner authorization, or to pay the $405.00 fees required to file a civil action. The order warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint.

What the Court Did

The court stated that Soto had not filed the application and prisoner authorization or paid the fees. It therefore dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. The dismissal was based on the filing requirements; the opinion did not decide the merits of Soto’s claims.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying fees. It directed the clerk to enter judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.