Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 18, 2025

Mallgren v. New York City

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-10067
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Mallgren v. New York City, Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied fee-waiver status for an appeal.

Who this affects

Anthony Brian Mallgren’s action against New York City was dismissed, and Mallgren was denied permission to appeal without paying the required filing fees.

What happened

In Mallgren v. New York City, the court entered judgment dismissing Anthony Brian Mallgren’s action against New York City. The judgment refers to reasons given in a March 14, 2025, order, but that order is not included here.

The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied Mallgren permission to proceed without paying the appeal filing fees.

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment on March 18, 2025.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mallgren v. New York City · No. 1:24-cv-10067
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 18, 2025

Disposition

The court entered a civil judgment dismissing the action. The judgment states that the dismissal is based on reasons explained in the court’s March 14, 2025, order. That earlier order is not included in the provided text, so the basis for dismissal cannot be determined from this judgment alone.

Appeal-related ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. In practical terms, the court denied Mallgren permission to appeal without paying the required filing fees. The judgment cites a Supreme Court decision explaining that good faith requires seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue.

Judge

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment on March 18, 2025.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.