Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 18, 2025

IN RE: Richard Arvalis Wright

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-09299
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In re Richard Arvalis Wright: Judge Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice after Wright neither filed an application to proceed without fees nor paid filing fees.

Who this affects

Richard Arvalis Wright and the complaint he filed; the court directed that judgment be entered.

What happened

In In re: Richard Arvalis Wright, the court had ordered Wright to either submit an application to proceed without paying the filing fee or pay the required $405 fee.

Wright did neither within the required thirty days, so the court dismissed the complaint without prejudice. This means the dismissal did not bar refiling.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied Wright permission to appeal without paying fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, and directed the clerk to enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
IN RE: Richard Arvalis Wright · No. 1:24-cv-09299
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 18, 2025

Background

The court had previously ordered Plaintiff, within thirty days, to either submit a completed application to proceed without paying the filing fee or pay the $405 in fees required to file a civil action. The earlier order warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint.

Court’s Ruling

Plaintiff did not submit the application or pay the filing fees. The court therefore dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. A dismissal without prejudice does not bar refiling.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying fees. The court also directed the clerk to enter judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.