Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 19, 2025

Global Media Network v. Youtube Music

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-00397
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Global Media Network v. Youtube Music, Judge Swain dismissed the action without prejudice after plaintiff neither paid filing fees nor submitted an IFP application.

Who this affects

Global Media Network's action was dismissed without prejudice. Youtube Music was the defendant in the dismissed action.

What happened

In Global Media Network v. Youtube Music, the court ordered Global Media Network to either submit an application to proceed without paying filing fees or pay the $405 required to file a civil action. The court gave Global Media Network 30 days to comply.

Global Media Network did neither. The court therefore dismissed the action without prejudice, meaning the dismissal did not bar refiling.

Judge Swain also ruled that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying appeal fees. The clerk was directed to enter judgment dismissing the action.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Global Media Network v. Youtube Music · No. 1:25-cv-00397
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 19, 2025

Background

By an order dated January 17, 2025, the court directed Global Media Network, within 30 days, either to submit a completed application to proceed without paying filing fees or to pay the $405 in fees required to file a civil action. The order warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal.

Global Media Network did not submit the application or pay the filing fees.

Ruling

The court dismissed the action without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal. The clerk was directed to enter judgment dismissing the action for the reason stated in the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.