Mallgren v. New York State
- Laura Swain
- 1:25-cv-01991
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
Mallgren v. New York State: Judge Swain dismissed the action without prejudice because Mallgren violated a prior filing injunction by not obtaining leave to proceed without fees.
Anthony Brian Mallgren’s ability to file future civil actions in the Southern District of New York without paying filing fees: the court’s prior injunction remains in effect and requires him to obtain permission before filing such an action.
What happened
In Mallgren v. New York State, Anthony Brian Mallgren filed a new civil action but did not pay the filing fees. The court therefore assumed he sought to proceed without paying those fees.
A prior order barred Mallgren from filing future civil actions in this court without paying fees unless he first obtained the court’s permission. He did not request that permission before filing this action.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the action without prejudice for violating the prior injunction. She also denied permission to appeal without paying fees, certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, and directed the Clerk to enter a civil judgment.
The detailed version
- Mallgren v. New York State · No. 1:25-cv-01991
- Laura Swain
- Mar. 21, 2025
Background
In a prior related proceeding, No. 14-CV-1420 (S.D.N.Y.), the court barred Anthony Brian Mallgren from filing future civil actions in the Southern District of New York without paying filing fees unless he first obtained the court’s permission. The court imposed that filing injunction because of Mallgren’s history of litigation that it described as frivolous, vexatious, or otherwise lacking merit in that court and other federal courts.
This Action
Mallgren filed this action against New York State, Maria DiBiase, and the New York State Department of Education. He did not pay the fees required to initiate the action, did not seek permission to proceed without paying those fees, and did not request permission to file the action under the prior injunction. Because he had not paid the filing fees, the court assumed that he sought to proceed without paying them.
Ruling
The court dismissed the action without prejudice for failure to comply with the prior filing injunction. The dismissal was based on the filing-injunction violation; the opinion did not decide the underlying claims against the defendants. The injunction remains in effect.
The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying fees. It directed the Clerk of Court to enter a civil judgment.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.