Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 24, 2025

Vega v. Molina

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:23-cv-11025
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Motion to DismissCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Vega v. Molina, Judge Schofield granted defendants’ motions to dismiss, denied leave to replead, and closed the case.

Who this affects

Gisette Vega and defendants Louis Molina and the other defendants named in the judgment; the case is closed.

What happened

In Vega v. Molina, the judgment states that the defendants’ motions to dismiss were granted for the reasons given in the Court’s March 21, 2025, opinion and order. The judgment itself does not describe the underlying claims or events.

The court also denied Gisette Vega leave to file an amended complaint because it stated that better pleading would not cure the lack of a constitutional violation. The judgment does not say that the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

Judge Lorna Schofield’s judgment closed the case after granting the defendants’ motions to dismiss and denying leave to replead.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Vega v. Molina · No. 1:23-cv-11025
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Mar. 24, 2025

Disposition

The judgment grants the motions to dismiss filed by the defendants, including Louis Molina and the other named defendants. It also denies leave to replead, meaning permission to file another version of the complaint. The judgment states that better pleading would not cure the lack of a constitutional violation. The case is closed.

What the Judgment Says

The judgment relies on the court’s opinion and order dated March 21, 2025, but that opinion and order is not included in the provided text. As a result, the judgment does not identify the specific claims, factual allegations, or legal arguments addressed in the motions. It also does not state that the dismissal was with prejudice or without prejudice.

Classification

This is a procedural order because it grants motions to dismiss, resolving the case at the pleading stage rather than deciding the underlying claims on the merits.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.