1st Amendment Praetorian v. The New York Times Company
- 1:23-cv-00012
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In 1st Amendment Praetorian v. The New York Times Company, the court granted dismissal, dismissed the claims, and closed the case.
The plaintiff’s claims were dismissed, and the defendants prevailed on their motion to dismiss. The case was closed.
What happened
In 1st Amendment Praetorian v. The New York Times Company, the defendants asked the court to dismiss the plaintiff’s claims.
The court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissed the plaintiff’s claims. The judgment states that allowing the plaintiff to amend the claims would be futile.
The court entered judgment for the defendants and closed the case. The opinion text provided does not name the judge; the judgment was dated March 28, 2025.
The detailed version
- 1st Amendment Praetorian v. The New York Times Company · No. 1:23-cv-00012
- Mar. 28, 2025
Ruling
The court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss. It dismissed the plaintiff’s claims and found that granting leave to amend would be futile. The judgment does not state that the dismissal was with or without prejudice.
Disposition
The case was closed. The provided judgment refers to the court’s Opinion and Order dated March 28, 2025, but that underlying opinion is not included here. The judgment was signed by the clerk of court, Tammi M. Hellwig, not by a named judge.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.