Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 31, 2025

Namvary v. Carter's Inc.

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:24-cv-06787
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Namvary v. Carter's Inc., Judge Liman granted Carter's motion to transfer the case to the Northern District of Georgia.

Who this affects

The plaintiff and defendants are affected because the case will proceed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia rather than the Southern District of New York. The transfer also concerns the parties and witnesses whose convenience the court considered.

What happened

Namvary v. Carter's Inc. is a proposed class action filed in New York. Carter's Inc. asked to move the case to the Northern District of Georgia, and the plaintiff did not oppose the request.

The court found that the case could have been filed in Georgia because Carter's Inc. has its principal place of business there. It also found that transfer would be more convenient and would improve coordination and trial efficiency with similar cases in California and Oregon.

Judge Liman granted the motion and transferred the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia under the federal transfer statute. The clerk was directed to close the transfer-related docket entries.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Namvary v. Carter's Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-06787
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
Mar. 31, 2025

Background

Shaheen Namvary brought this proposed class action against Carter's Inc. and other listed defendants. Carter's Inc. moved under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to transfer the case from the Southern District of New York to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Namvary did not oppose the motion.

Legal standard

Section 1404(a) permits a federal court to transfer a civil action for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice, if the case could have been brought in the receiving district or all parties consented. The court first considers whether the receiving court could have heard the case, then whether the balance of convenience favors transfer.

Court's analysis

The court held that the case could have been brought in the Northern District of Georgia because Carter's Inc. has its principal place of business in Georgia. The court also determined that the balance of convenience favored transfer. Similar claims against Carter's Inc. were pending in the Central District of California and the District of Oregon, and the plaintiffs in all three cases had common counsel. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation had declined to consolidate the cases for pretrial proceedings but stated that they could be coordinated informally. The panel also noted that the plaintiffs did not oppose centralization in the Northern District of Georgia. Because the plaintiff did not oppose transfer, the court gave little weight to the original choice of New York as the forum.

Disposition

Judge Lewis J. Liman granted Carter's motion to transfer. The case was transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). The clerk was directed to close Docket Nos. 19 and 22.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.