Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 31, 2025

Mallgren v. United States

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-02254
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Mallgren v. United States, Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied fee-waiver status for an appeal.

Who this affects

Anthony Brian Mallgren, whose action was dismissed and whose fee-waiver status for an appeal was denied; the United States of America and the other named defendants were also affected by the dismissal.

What happened

Mallgren v. United States involved an action brought by Anthony Brian Mallgren against the United States of America and other defendants. The judgment does not describe the claims or underlying events.

The court dismissed the action for the reasons stated in its March 28, 2025, order, which is not included in the provided text. It also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal.

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the March 31, 2025, judgment. The provided judgment does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mallgren v. United States · No. 1:25-cv-02254
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 31, 2025

Background

Anthony Brian Mallgren sued the United States of America and other defendants. The civil judgment states that the action was dismissed for the reasons given in a March 28, 2025, order. That earlier order is not included in the provided opinion, so the claims, facts, and stated basis for dismissal cannot be determined from this text.

Ruling

The court dismissed the action. It certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. Based on that certification, the court denied Mallgren in forma pauperis status for an appeal. In forma pauperis status generally permits a person to proceed without prepaying court fees, but this judgment does not otherwise describe any appeal.

The judgment does not say whether the dismissal was with prejudice or without prejudice. It also does not state whether the dismissal was based on the merits, jurisdiction, pleading requirements, or another ground; those details may appear in the March 28 order.

Judge and Date

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment on March 31, 2025, in New York, New York.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.