Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 31, 2025

Grant v. Venango County Sheriffs Office

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-02614
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Grant v. Venango County Sheriffs, Judge Swain transferred the case to Pennsylvania because the alleged events occurred there.

Who this affects

Elizabeth Mary Grant and the defendants named in the action. The case was moved from the Southern District of New York to the Western District of Pennsylvania, where further decisions—including whether Grant may proceed without prepaying fees—are to be made.

What happened

Elizabeth Mary Grant sued the Venango County Sheriffs, Venango County Jail, Sergeant Williams, and other individuals over events that allegedly occurred in January 2025 in Oil City, Pennsylvania. Grant brought the case without a lawyer while incarcerated in New York.

Judge Swain determined that venue—the proper federal court location—did not appear to be in the Southern District of New York because not all defendants appeared to reside there and the events occurred in Venango County, Pennsylvania.

The court transferred the action to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania and closed the case in New York. Judge Swain also denied fee-free status for any appeal and left any decision about proceeding without prepaying fees to the Pennsylvania court.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Grant v. Venango County Sheriffs Office · No. 1:25-cv-02614
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 31, 2025

Background

Elizabeth Mary Grant filed the action without a lawyer. The opinion states that she was incarcerated at the Rose M. Singer Center on Rikers Island. She asserted claims arising from events in January 2025 in Oil City, Venango County, Pennsylvania. The defendants were captioned as Venango County Sheriffs, Venango County Jail, Sergeant Williams, Ray Whittan, Ann Graff, and Ruth Thompson. The opinion says that some individual defendants appeared to have been Grant’s neighbors in Pennsylvania.

Venue analysis

Venue is the federal judicial district where a lawsuit may properly proceed. The court applied 28 U.S.C. § 1391 and explained that venue may generally be based on where defendants reside or where a substantial part of the events occurred. The court concluded that venue did not appear proper in the Southern District of New York based on defendants’ residence because not all defendants resided in New York. It also concluded that venue did not appear proper there based on the events because Grant alleged that her rights were violated in Oil City, which is in Venango County and within the Western District of Pennsylvania.

Ruling

The court transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1404(a) and 1406. The Clerk was directed to make the transfer, no summons was to issue from the Southern District of New York, and the order closed the case in that district. The court stated that the transferee court would decide whether Grant could continue without prepaying fees. Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.