Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 2, 2025

Frazier v. Morgan Stanley & Co, LLC

Judge
Richard Sullivan
Docket
1:16-cv-00804
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Frazier v. Morgan Stanley, Judge Sullivan dismissed Yared Abraham’s claims with prejudice after settlement and retained jurisdiction to enforce it.

Who this affects

Yared Abraham’s claims were dismissed in their entirety with prejudice and without costs, and the action was terminated as to him. The court retained jurisdiction to enforce his settlement agreement.

What happened

In Frazier v. Morgan Stanley & Co, LLC, the parties informed the court that plaintiff Yared Abraham had reached a settlement with the defendants.

The order does not describe the settlement’s terms or address the underlying claims. It concerns only Mr. Abraham’s claims.

Judge Sullivan dismissed Mr. Abraham’s claims in their entirety with prejudice and without costs, retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement, and directed the clerk to terminate the action as to him.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Frazier v. Morgan Stanley & Co, LLC · No. 1:16-cv-00804
Judge
Richard Sullivan
Date
Apr. 2, 2025

Background

The court received a submission from the parties stating that plaintiff Yared Abraham had reached a settlement with the defendants. The opinion does not provide the settlement’s terms.

Ruling

The court ordered that Mr. Abraham’s claims be dismissed in their entirety with prejudice and without costs. It retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement and directed the clerk to terminate the action as to Mr. Abraham.

Significance

This order resolves Yared Abraham’s participation in the case based on the reported settlement. It does not decide the underlying claims on their merits or describe how the settlement affects the other plaintiffs or defendants.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.