Robinson v. JHR Solutions, LLC.
- Jon Tigar
- 4:24-cv-07126
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 2
In Robinson v. JHR Solutions, Judge Tigar continued the conference and ordered the parties to explain why monetary sanctions should not be imposed.
The parties and their attorneys of record were required to file a joint case management statement, respond to the order to show cause, and attend the continued case management conference. They may face monetary sanctions if the court determines sanctions are warranted.
What happened
In Robinson v. JHR Solutions, LLC., the parties twice failed to file a required joint case management statement. The court therefore continued the case management conference from April 8, 2025, to May 20, 2025, at 2:00 p.m., and set May 13, 2025, as the new deadline for the statement.
The court ordered the parties and their attorneys to explain why monetary sanctions should not be imposed for repeatedly and willfully violating the court’s orders. Their written response was due April 15, 2025.
Judge Jon S. Tigar issued the order on April 7, 2025. The court scheduled the hearing on the order to show cause to occur at the same time as the May 20 case management conference.
The detailed version
- Robinson v. JHR Solutions, LLC. · No. 4:24-cv-07126
- Jon Tigar
- Apr. 7, 2025
Background
The court had originally scheduled a case management conference for April 1, 2025, and ordered the parties to file a joint case management statement by March 25, 2025. The parties did not file the statement. On March 27, 2025, the court continued the conference to April 8, 2025, and ordered the parties to file the statement by April 1, 2025.
The parties again had not filed the statement when the court issued this order.
Court’s action
The court continued the case management conference to May 20, 2025, at 2:00 p.m. A joint case management statement was due May 13, 2025.
The court also ordered the parties and their attorneys of record to show cause—meaning to explain—why monetary sanctions should not be imposed for their repeated, willful violations of the court’s orders. A written response was due April 15, 2025. The court scheduled a hearing on the order to show cause at the same time as the May 20 case management conference.
Judge Jon S. Tigar signed the order. The opinion does not decide the underlying claims or defenses in the case.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.