Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 11, 2025

Brown v. Kijakazi

Judge
Robert Illman
Docket
1:23-cv-06198
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
4
Fee PetitionSocial Security
In one sentence

In Brown v. Kijakazi, Judge Illman approved a $10,073 Equal Access to Justice Act attorney-fee award, subject to Treasury offset.

Who this affects

Robert Brown and his attorney, Katherine R. Siegfried, are affected by the $10,073 fee award and its payment and offset conditions; the government must process the award as ordered.

What happened

In Brown v. Kijakazi, the parties asked the court to approve their agreement about attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The agreement said Robert Brown was the prevailing party and requested $10,073 for legal services in this case.

The agreement states that the fee award belongs to Brown and may be reduced to pay qualifying debts through the Treasury Offset Program. If the required conditions are met, payment may instead be made to Brown’s attorney. The agreement also says it does not admit liability and does not prevent a later request for fees under another Social Security law.

Judge Robert M. Illman approved the stipulation and ordered an Equal Access to Justice Act fee award of $10,073, subject to Treasury offset and payment under the parties’ agreement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Brown v. Kijakazi · No. 1:23-cv-06198
Judge
Robert Illman
Date
Apr. 11, 2025

Background

This document concerns a request for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in Robert Brown’s Social Security case. Brown and the government jointly stipulated to an award of $10,073 for all legal services provided by Katherine R. Siegfried in connection with the action. The stipulation states that Brown was the prevailing party and that Brown’s net worth was less than $2 million.

The document’s caption identifies Leland Deduk as the Acting Commissioner of Social Security and includes a footnote stating that he should be substituted as the defendant. The supplied case name is Brown v. Kijakazi.

Payment and Conditions

Under the parties’ stipulation, the fee award belongs to Brown rather than directly to Brown’s attorney and is subject to the Treasury Offset Program. After the court’s fee order, the Commissioner may make the payment payable to Brown’s attorney if Brown assigned the right to the fees, Brown owes no qualifying debt, and the Commissioner waives the Anti-Assignment Act’s requirements. If a qualifying debt exists, the remaining amount after offset is to be paid to Brown but delivered to Brown’s attorney.

The stipulation describes the agreement as a compromise settlement. It does not admit liability by the defendant and provides a complete release of claims concerning Equal Access to Justice Act fees and expenses in this action. It states that the award does not prevent the Law Office of Katherine Siegfried from seeking fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the applicable Equal Access to Justice Act savings provisions.

Ruling

Judge Robert M. Illman approved the parties’ stipulation and ordered an Equal Access to Justice Act attorney-fee award of $10,073. The order made the award subject to Treasury offset and directed that it be paid in the manner described in the stipulation.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.