Colorado v. Saul
- Robert Illman
- 1:20-cv-06218
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 3
George Santos Colorado v. Commissioner of Social Security: Judge Illman ordered $8,000 in Equal Access to Justice Act fees, subject to Treasury offset.
George Santos Colorado, his attorney and law office, and the Commissioner of Social Security are affected. The award may be reduced if an eligible Treasury offset applies.
What happened
In George Santos Colorado v. Commissioner of Social Security, the parties asked the court to approve an agreement awarding the plaintiff $8,000 in attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The stipulation said the plaintiff was the prevailing party.
The award covers legal services in this case and is subject to the federal Treasury Offset Program, which can reduce payments to satisfy certain debts. The parties also agreed that payment would resolve claims for these fees and expenses, while preserving counsel’s ability to seek fees under another Social Security law.
Judge Robert M. Illman approved the stipulation and ordered the $8,000 award under the stated payment conditions.
The detailed version
- Colorado v. Saul · No. 1:20-cv-06218
- Robert Illman
- July 28, 2025
Background
The parties submitted a stipulation asking the court to approve an award of attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). The stipulation stated that George Santos Colorado was the prevailing party and that the requested amount covered all legal services provided by Katherine R. Siegfried in connection with this civil action.
Agreement and payment terms
The agreed fee amount was $8,000. Under the agreement, the fees belong to the plaintiff and may be reduced through the Treasury Offset Program if the plaintiff owes an eligible debt. After the court’s fee order, the Commissioner would consider whether the plaintiff assigned the fees to counsel, whether the plaintiff had an offset-eligible debt, and whether the government would waive the Anti-Assignment Act’s requirements. Depending on those determinations, payment could be made to the attorney or to the plaintiff and delivered to the attorney.
The stipulation described the payment as a compromise settlement of the fee request and said it was not an admission of liability by the defendant. Payment would release claims concerning Equal Access to Justice Act fees and expenses in this action. The stipulation preserved the Law Office of Katherine Siegfried’s ability to seek attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the applicable limits protecting against double recovery.
Ruling
Judge Robert M. Illman approved the stipulation and ordered Equal Access to Justice Act attorney fees of $8,000, subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program and payable as outlined in the parties’ stipulation. The order addressed the fee request; the opinion text does not decide the underlying Social Security dispute.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.