Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 12, 2025

Mallgren v. John Doe Pro Se Court Clerks

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-01951
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Mallgren v. John Doe Pro Se Court Clerks, Judge Swain dismissed the action without prejudice for violating an earlier filing injunction and denied fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

Brian Mallgren’s action was dismissed without prejudice, and he remains subject to the filing injunction requiring court permission before filing a new civil action without paying fees in this court.

What happened

Mallgren v. John Doe Pro Se Court Clerks involved a new civil action filed by Brian Mallgren without paying the filing fee or obtaining permission to proceed without paying it. The court therefore assumed he sought that fee waiver.

An earlier order barred Mallgren from filing future civil actions in this court without first obtaining permission if he sought to proceed without paying fees. The earlier order was based on the court’s stated view that he had a history of frivolous, vexatious, or otherwise nonmeritorious litigation. Mallgren did not seek permission before filing this action.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the action without prejudice for violating the earlier filing injunction. The court also denied fee-waiver status for any appeal, directed the clerk to enter a civil judgment, and stated that the filing injunction remains in effect.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mallgren v. John Doe Pro Se Court Clerks · No. 1:25-cv-01951
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 12, 2025

Background

Brian Mallgren filed this civil action without paying the fees required to initiate it and without asking for permission to proceed without paying those fees. The court assumed that he sought to proceed under the fee-waiver process, commonly called proceeding in forma pauperis.

In an earlier related proceeding, No. 14-CV-1420 (S.D.N.Y.), the court had barred Mallgren from filing any future civil action in that court without first obtaining the court’s permission if he sought to proceed without paying fees. The earlier order was based on the court’s stated finding that Mallgren had a history of frivolous, vexatious, or otherwise nonmeritorious litigation in that court and other federal courts.

Reason for Dismissal

The court concluded that Mallgren had not complied with the earlier filing injunction because he did not obtain permission before filing this action. The order did not address the underlying claims or decide their merits.

Ruling

The court dismissed the action without prejudice for failure to comply with the filing injunction issued in the earlier related proceeding. The injunction remains in effect. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-waiver status for purposes of an appeal. It directed the Clerk of Court to enter a civil judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.