Cannady v. Watson
- Laura Swain
- 1:24-cv-09300
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Cannady v. Watson, Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied in forma pauperis status for any appeal.
Vincent Cannady’s action against RaeHan Watson was dismissed. Cannady was also denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees.
What happened
In Cannady v. Watson, the court entered a civil judgment dismissing Vincent Cannady’s action against RaeHan Watson. The judgment gives no explanation of the underlying dispute.
The judgment says the dismissal was for the reasons stated in an April 14, 2025, order, but that order is not included in the provided text. The basis for dismissal therefore cannot be determined from this judgment alone.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Cannady permission to proceed without paying filing fees for an appeal.
The detailed version
- Cannady v. Watson · No. 1:24-cv-09300
- Laura Swain
- Apr. 15, 2025
Ruling
The court entered a civil judgment dismissing Vincent Cannady’s action against RaeHan Watson. The judgment states that the dismissal was based on reasons given in an April 14, 2025, order. That earlier order is not included in the provided opinion text, so the judgment does not reveal the legal or factual basis for dismissal.
Appeal-Filing Status
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied in forma pauperis status—the ability to pursue an appeal without paying the required filing fees—for purposes of an appeal. The judgment cites Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962).
Disposition
The action was dismissed. The judgment does not state that the dismissal was with prejudice or without prejudice.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.