Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 14, 2025

Mallgren v. United States

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-02623
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Mallgren v. United States, Judge Swain dismissed the action without prejudice because Mallgren violated an earlier filing injunction.

Who this affects

Anthony Brian Mallgren’s action was dismissed without prejudice, and he was denied permission to proceed without paying the filing fee for an appeal.

What happened

Anthony Brian Mallgren filed this new civil action without paying the filing fee, so the court treated it as a request to proceed without paying. A 2016 order had barred him from filing future civil actions without paying unless he first obtained court permission.

Mallgren had not obtained that permission before filing this case. The court therefore dismissed the action without prejudice for violating the earlier injunction and directed the clerk to enter a civil judgment.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Mallgren permission to proceed without paying the appeal fee.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mallgren v. United States · No. 1:25-cv-02623
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Apr. 14, 2025

Background

Anthony Brian Mallgren filed this civil action without prepaying the filing fees. The court therefore assumed that he sought permission to proceed without paying those fees. In a 2016 order in a prior related proceeding, the court had barred Mallgren from filing future civil actions without paying the filing fee unless he first obtained leave, or permission, from the court. The opinion states that the earlier filing injunction was based on Mallgren’s history of frivolous, vexatious, or otherwise nonmeritorious litigation in this court and other federal courts.

Ruling

The court found that Mallgren had not obtained the required permission before filing this action. It dismissed the action without prejudice for failure to comply with the earlier injunction. “Without prejudice” means the dismissal itself does not bar a new filing, although the stated filing restriction remains relevant.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying the filing fee for an appeal. It directed the clerk to enter a civil judgment. Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.