Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 15, 2025

Piccolo v. New York City Board of Elections

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:25-cv-02617
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Piccolo v. New York City Board of Elections, Judge Woods ordered the Marshals Service to serve the defendant after Piccolo was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees.

Who this affects

Arthur Piccolo and the New York City Board of Elections; the U.S. Marshals Service and Clerk of Court must take steps to serve the defendant.

What happened

In Piccolo v. New York City Board of Elections, Arthur Piccolo, representing himself, sued the New York City Board of Elections under a federal civil-rights law, seeking to stop alleged violations of his constitutional rights. The court had allowed him to proceed without prepaying filing fees.

Because Piccolo was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court directed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons, prepare the required service form, and send the necessary papers to the U.S. Marshals Service. The Marshals Service will serve the Board of Elections.

The court also said service must occur within 90 days after the summons is issued, and Piccolo should request more time if necessary. Judge Woods warned that Piccolo must report any address change and that the case may be dismissed if he does not.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Piccolo v. New York City Board of Elections · No. 1:25-cv-02617
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
Apr. 15, 2025

Background

Arthur Piccolo, who is representing himself, brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking to enjoin, or prevent, the New York City Board of Elections from violating his federal constitutional rights. In an earlier order dated March 31, 2025, the court granted Piccolo permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees.

Service of Process

Because Piccolo was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court stated that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant. The Clerk of Court was instructed to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for the Board of Elections, issue a summons, and deliver the summons and other necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service.

The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued because Piccolo could not have served the defendant before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered issuance of the summons. If service is not completed within that period, Piccolo should request an extension of time. The court also stated that Piccolo must notify it in writing if his address changes and that the action may be dismissed if he fails to do so.

Disposition

The court entered an order of service. It directed the Clerk of Court to issue the summons, complete the service form with the Board of Elections’ address, and deliver the necessary documents to the U.S. Marshals Service. It also directed the Clerk to mail Piccolo an information package. The order did not decide whether Piccolo’s constitutional claims are valid. Judge Gregory H. Woods signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.