The People of The State of New York v. Amelio
- Vargas
- 1:25-cv-02238
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 5
People of the State of New York v. Amelio: Judge Vargas remanded Amelio’s traffic-ticket prosecution because federal removal requirements were not met.
Carmine Amelio’s state-court traffic-ticket proceeding was sent back to the Town Court of the Town of Dover, County of Dutchess; the federal case was closed.
What happened
In People of the State of New York v. Amelio, Carmine Amelio, representing himself, tried to move two New York traffic tickets from Dover Town Court to federal court. He argued that the federal court had authority because of different-state citizenship and federal civil-rights issues.
Judge Vargas found that Amelio filed the removal notice on time, but he did not show that the narrow rules for moving a state criminal case to federal court applied. His objections to the traffic stop and tickets did not establish that he was a federal officer or that he could not enforce equal-civil-rights protections in the state court.
Judge Vargas held that the removal was improper and remanded the action to Dover Town Court. The federal court directed the Clerk to send the order to that court, close the federal case, and terminate all pending matters.
The detailed version
- The People of The State of New York v. Amelio · No. 1:25-cv-02238
- Vargas
- Apr. 16, 2025
Background
Carmine Amelio, proceeding without a lawyer and without paying the filing fee, filed a notice seeking to remove a case from the Town Court of the Town of Dover, County of Dutchess, to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The removed matter involved two Uniform Traffic Tickets issued on February 13, 2025, for alleged violations of Sections 1128(D) and 1163(0A) of the New York Vehicle and Traffic Law.
Amelio asserted that federal jurisdiction existed because the parties were citizens of different states and because the case raised questions under federal law. He also asserted civil-rights claims apparently arising from the traffic stop, naming Trooper J.C. Cruz, the New York State Police, and the State of New York. The court explained that civil-rights counterclaims cannot create federal jurisdiction over the underlying state-court action.
Analysis
Federal law permits removal of a state criminal case only in narrow circumstances. Those circumstances include a case against a federal officer or member of the armed forces for conduct performed under official authority, or a case in which the defendant was denied—or cannot enforce—rights protecting the equal civil rights of U.S. citizens.
The court construed Amelio’s filing liberally because he was representing himself. It found that his notice was timely under the applicable federal rule because it was filed after the February 13 tickets and before the relevant deadline. But the court held that Amelio did not allege facts showing that either statutory basis for removing a criminal case applied. He did not allege that he was a federal officer or armed-forces member acting under official authority, nor did he claim that he could not enforce a right to racial equality or another equal-civil-rights protection in Dover Town Court. His challenge to the traffic stop and tickets was not enough to support removal.
Disposition
The court held that removal was improper and remanded the action to the Town Court of the Town of Dover, County of Dutchess. It directed the Clerk to send that court a copy of the order and close the federal case. All pending matters were terminated. Judge Jeannette A. Vargas signed the order.
Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.