Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 16, 2025

Jackson v. The Federal Law and Order Office of the Civil Rights of Security

Full caption

Jackson v. The Federal Law and Order Office of the Civil Rights of Security, Amazing International Service on Earthquake Overruling Race Decision

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-03103
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Jackson v. The Federal Law and Order Office, Judge Swain dismissed the case without prejudice because Jackson lacked required permission to seek fee-free filing status.

Who this affects

Henry Jackson, whose new action was dismissed without prejudice and whose fee-free status for an appeal was denied.

What happened

In Henry Jackson v. The Federal Law and Order Office of the Civil Rights of Security, Amazing International Service on Earthquake Overruling Race Decision, Jackson sought permission to file without paying court fees.

A 2019 order had barred Jackson from filing any new civil action in that court without first obtaining permission. The opinion says Jackson did not request that permission before bringing this case.

The court dismissed the case without prejudice for violating the earlier order, denied fee-free status for any appeal, and directed the clerk to enter judgment. Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain issued the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jackson v. The Federal Law and Order Office of the Civil Rights of Security · No. 1:25-cv-03103
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Apr. 16, 2025

Background

The opinion states that, on April 23, 2019, the court barred Jackson from filing any new civil action in that court without first obtaining the court’s permission to proceed without paying filing fees. The earlier round of this case is identified as No. 1:19-CV-1827, ECF 6 (S.D.N.Y.). The opinion also states that an appeal from that order was dismissed and that the filing restriction became effective June 10, 2019.

New Filing

Jackson brought this action seeking permission to proceed without paying filing fees. The opinion says he did not first seek the required permission to file the action.

Ruling

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1651, the court dismissed this action without prejudice because Jackson failed to comply with the 2019 order. The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying filing fees for purposes of an appeal. The court directed the clerk to enter judgment. Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.