Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 18, 2025

Young v. Italiantouch Usa, Inc.

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:25-cv-01329
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Young v. Italiantouch, Judge Abrams discontinued the settled-in-principle case without costs, allowing restoration within 45 days.

Who this affects

The action brought by LesHawn Young on behalf of herself and other similarly situated people against Italiantouch Usa, Inc. was discontinued and closed, subject to a possible application to restore it within 45 days.

What happened

In Young v. Italiantouch Usa, Inc., the court was told that the parties had settled the case in principle. The opinion does not describe the settlement’s terms.

The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s docket if an application was made within 45 days. The court also said any request for it to keep authority to enforce the settlement had to place the agreement on the public record and receive the court’s approval within that period.

Judge Ronnie Abrams ordered the Clerk of Court to close the case. The order did not decide the underlying claims and warned that a request to reopen filed after 45 days could be denied solely because it was late.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Young v. Italiantouch Usa, Inc. · No. 1:25-cv-01329
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Apr. 18, 2025

Background

LesHawn Young brought this action on behalf of herself and other similarly situated people against Italiantouch Usa, Inc. The court was informed that the case had been settled in principle. The opinion does not provide the settlement terms or state that the court approved a final settlement.

Court’s Action

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 45 days. It stated that any application to reopen filed after that period could be denied solely because it was late.

The court further ordered that, if the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction—continuing authority—to enforce a settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 45-day period. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.

Disposition

Judge Ronnie Abrams entered a procedural order discontinuing the action and closing the case. The order did not resolve the underlying claims on their merits.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.