Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 21, 2025

Robles v. Lambsbreath LLC

Judge
Sarah Netburn
Docket
1:24-cv-07501
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureEvidence
In one sentence

In Robles v. Lambsbreath LLC, Judge Netburn ordered written submissions on damages and allowed the defendant to respond before deciding whether a hearing is needed.

Who this affects

Primitivo Robles and Lambsbreath LLC, doing business as Lamb’s Bread Dispensary.

What happened

Robles v. Lambsbreath LLC is an order setting procedures for deciding the plaintiff’s damages. The opinion says Judge Jennifer L. Rochon referred the case to Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn for an inquiry and recommendation about damages.

The plaintiff must file proposed factual findings, legal conclusions, and supporting evidence within 30 days. The plaintiff must also mail the filings and the order to the defendant’s last known address and file proof of service. The defendant may respond within 30 days after receiving the filing and may submit its own proposed findings.

Judge Sarah Netburn said the damages inquiry may be decided from written submissions alone. A party seeking a hearing must explain why written submissions are insufficient and identify the witnesses and evidence it would present. The order does not decide the amount of damages.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Robles v. Lambsbreath LLC · No. 1:24-cv-07501
Judge
Sarah Netburn
Date
Apr. 21, 2025

Background

The caption identifies the plaintiff as Primitivo Robles and the defendant as Lambsbreath LLC, doing business as Lamb’s Bread Dispensary. On April 18, 2025, Judge Jennifer L. Rochon referred the case to Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn to conduct an inquest—an inquiry—and submit a report and recommendation concerning the plaintiff’s damages.

Order

The court ordered the plaintiff to file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law describing all claimed damages and other requested monetary relief within 30 days after the order’s entry. The plaintiff must support each proposed factual finding with affidavits or other documentary evidence and cite the supporting evidence. The plaintiff must file the materials electronically, mail complete copies of the filing and order to the defendant’s last known address, and file a certificate of service.

The defendant may file a response within 30 days after service. The defendant must respond to each proposed finding and conclusion and may also submit counter-findings and counter-conclusions. The defendant must support its proposed factual findings with affidavits or other documentary evidence and cite the supporting evidence.

Potential Hearing and Disposition

The court stated that it may conduct the damages inquiry based solely on the parties’ written submissions. A party seeking an evidentiary hearing must explain why the inquiry should not proceed on written submissions alone and describe the witnesses and evidence it would present. The order sets procedures for the damages inquiry; it does not determine the amount of damages or enter a final damages ruling. Judge Sarah Netburn also required courtesy copies of filings as provided by her individual practices.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.