Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Apr. 23, 2025

Diaz v. O'Malley

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:24-cv-08190
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Social SecurityCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Diaz v. O'Malley, Judge Broderick reversed and remanded the Social Security action for a hearing and new decision.

Who this affects

Jose Diaz and the Social Security Administration proceedings concerning his case; the Administrative Law Judge must provide a hearing opportunity and issue a new decision.

What happened

In Diaz v. O'Malley, Jose Diaz brought an action against the Social Security Commissioner. The opinion does not explain the underlying dispute or the reasons for the requested relief.

The court reversed and remanded the action to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. The Administrative Law Judge must offer Diaz a hearing and issue a new decision.

Judge Vernon Broderick is identified as the judge in the case information provided. The judgment is dated April 23, 2025.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Diaz v. O'Malley · No. 1:24-cv-08190
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Apr. 23, 2025

Background

The opinion is a judgment in a Social Security case brought by Jose Diaz against the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. It does not describe the underlying benefits dispute or the parties' arguments. The judgment refers to a stipulation and order dated April 23, 2025.

Ruling

The court reversed and remanded the action to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). A remand sends the matter back for further administrative proceedings. The Administrative Law Judge must offer Diaz the opportunity for a hearing and issue a new decision.

Disposition

The action was reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings. The judgment cites Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.