Tucker v. Columbus Trading-Partners Usa Inc.
- Ronnie Abrams
- 1:25-cv-00443
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Tucker v. Columbus Trading-Partners Usa Inc., Judge Abrams discontinued the settled-in-principle case without costs, allowing restoration within 45 days.
Henry Tucker, the similarly situated persons he sought to represent, and Columbus Trading-Partners USA Inc.
What happened
Henry Tucker brought this case on behalf of himself and other similarly situated people against Columbus Trading-Partners USA Inc. The court was told that the case had been settled in principle.
The court discontinued the case without costs to any party. The order allowed a party to ask to restore the case to the court’s docket within 45 days.
Judge Abrams also directed the Clerk of Court to close the case. The parties could ask the court to retain authority to enforce a settlement only if they placed the settlement terms on the public record and obtained the court’s approval within the stated 30-day period.
The detailed version
- Tucker v. Columbus Trading-Partners Usa Inc. · No. 1:25-cv-00443
- Ronnie Abrams
- Apr. 23, 2025
Background
Henry Tucker sued Columbus Trading-Partners USA Inc. on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated. The opinion states that the court was informed that the case had been settled in principle. It does not provide the settlement’s terms or resolve the underlying claims.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 45 days. The court stated that any application to reopen filed after that period could be denied solely because it was late.
The order further stated that, if the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.