Kershaw v. New York Life Insurance Company
- Vernon Broderick
- 1:23-cv-04159
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Kershaw v. New York Life, Judge Broderick stayed the action and gave Kershaw time to retain counsel or proceed without one.
Clinton Kershaw and New York Life Insurance Company; the case is paused while Kershaw obtains counsel or chooses to proceed without a lawyer.
What happened
Kershaw v. New York Life Insurance Company concerns a pending motion to dismiss that Kershaw did not oppose after his attorney became ill and later died.
The court said Kershaw’s failure to respond was caused by his attorney’s illness. It ordered New York Life to search for Kershaw’s contact information and try to deliver the order to him.
Judge Broderick stayed the case until June 23, 2025, so Kershaw could retain new counsel and oppose the motion or choose to proceed without a lawyer. The court did not decide the motion to dismiss in this order.
The detailed version
- Kershaw v. New York Life Insurance Company · No. 1:23-cv-04159
- Vernon Broderick
- Apr. 25, 2025
Background
The court stated that Plaintiff Clinton Kershaw’s attorney, William Wesley Frame, appeared to have died on August 16, 2024. The court also noted that all deadlines had previously been stayed and that Defendant New York Life Insurance Company’s unopposed motion to dismiss was pending.
The court attributed Kershaw’s failure to oppose the motion to dismiss to Frame’s illness. It therefore granted Kershaw leave to retain new counsel under a procedure set out in the order.
Court’s Orders
The court ordered New York Life to search its records for Kershaw’s contact information and attempt to serve him with the order by physical mail or email. New York Life had to file a letter by June 2, 2025, describing its efforts to serve him.
The court also stayed the action until June 23, 2025. During that period, Kershaw could either retain new counsel and oppose the pending motion to dismiss or choose to proceed without a lawyer. The court stated that, if it treated the motion as unopposed, it would independently review the complaint and applicable law before deciding whether to grant or deny the motion.
Disposition
Judge Broderick stayed the action and granted Kershaw an opportunity to obtain new counsel or proceed without one. The order did not grant or deny the pending motion to dismiss.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.