Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 29, 2025

Fernandez v. City Of New York

Judge
Ona Wang
Docket
1:21-cv-00680
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
12
Civil ProcedureFee PetitionCivil Rights
In one sentence

In Fernandez v. City Of New York, Judge Wang approved a $360,000 settlement, modified the children’s awards, and granted $118,589.63 in fees plus costs.

Who this affects

Barbie Ozuna, Zoe Ozuna, E.O., and I.O.; plaintiffs’ counsel; and the City of New York and the other defendants.

What happened

Fernandez v. City Of New York involved claims by Barbie Ozuna and her children arising from Ozuna’s arrest, the children’s removal from her custody, medical examinations, and placement in foster care. The claims alleged violations of federal civil-rights protections.

The parties agreed to settle for $360,000, including attorneys’ fees and costs. The court reviewed the proposed settlement because it involved children and found that it was fair, reasonable, and in E.O. and I.O.’s best interests. The court recalculated the children’s shares after correcting the fee calculation.

Judge Wang granted in part the motion to approve the infant settlement, with modifications. She approved $118,589.63 in attorneys’ fees and $4,231.10 in costs, leaving Barbie Ozuna with $30,000 and Zoe Ozuna, E.O., and I.O. with $69,059.76 each.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Fernandez v. City Of New York · No. 1:21-cv-00680
Judge
Ona Wang
Date
Apr. 29, 2025

Background

Barbara Fernandez, now known as Barbie Ozuna, brought this civil-rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violations of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. She sued on her own behalf and on behalf of Zoe Ozuna, E.O., and I.O. The allegations concerned Ozuna’s arrest, the removal of her children from her custody, medical strip searches of the children without parental consent, and the children’s placement in foster care.

The parties conducted extensive discovery and negotiated a settlement after settlement conferences and calls. They agreed to resolve the case for a total settlement cost of $360,000, including attorneys’ fees and costs. Because the settlement involved minor children, the court had to review and approve the proposed settlement, known as an infant compromise order, to determine whether it protected the children’s interests and whether the settlement, fees, and costs were fair and reasonable.

Settlement Review

The court found that the settlement was reached through arm’s-length negotiations, that the parties had conducted enough discovery for counsel to evaluate the case, and that the proposed compromise reasonably accounted for the complexity, risks, expense, duration, and likely rewards of continued litigation. The court also gave substantial weight to Ozuna’s statement that she understood the risks and believed the settlement was best for her children.

The proposed allocation designated $30,000 for Ozuna and $110,000 for each of Zoe Ozuna, E.O., and I.O. The proposal sought $120,000 in attorneys’ fees and $4,231.10 in costs. The court determined that the one-third contingency fee should be calculated from the net settlement after costs, not from the gross $360,000 amount. That calculation produced an attorneys’ fee of $118,589.63.

Fees, Costs, and Revised Awards

The court approved the $4,231.10 in costs because counsel provided sufficient documentation, including records for deposition and transcript fees, process-server expenses, and the filing fee. It also approved $118,589.63 in attorneys’ fees. The court considered the contingency-fee agreement advisory, compared the requested fee with a lodestar estimate—the hours reasonably worked multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate—and found the requested fee reasonable and appropriate.

After deducting the costs and fees, the court recalculated the awards. Barbie Ozuna received $30,000. Zoe Ozuna, E.O., and I.O. each received $69,059.76. The total amount paid to the plaintiffs after fees and costs was $237,179.28.

Disposition

Judge Wang concluded that the $360,000 settlement was fair, reasonable, and proper and approved the infant compromise order. The court granted in part the motion to approve the infant compromise order, with modifications, and granted counsel’s request for $118,589.63 in attorneys’ fees plus $4,231.10 in costs.

The authoritative version

Read the full 12-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.