Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 3, 2025

McInnis v. City of New York

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:24-cv-03449
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
14
Civil ProcedureCivil RightsFee Petition
In one sentence

In McInnis v. City of New York, Magistrate Judge Tarnofsky approved a $100,000 settlement involving three children without a hearing.

Who this affects

Jennifer McInnis and her three children receive the approved settlement payments, while the City of New York and Treasure Pray resolve the claims against them. Leah Bralow and Rutmi Goradia remain non-settling defendants.

What happened

McInnis v. City of New York concerns claims that City Administration for Children’s Services caseworker Treasure Pray removed O.S. from school, took him to a hospital, searched McInnis’s home, and questioned and examined McInnis’s younger children during a child-neglect investigation.

McInnis and the three children sought approval of a settlement with the City and Pray. The settlement provided $100,000 total: payments to McInnis and each child, with the remainder going to their lawyer. The claims against Leah Bralow and Rutmi Goradia were not settled, while other defendants had already been dismissed.

Magistrate Judge Tarnofsky approved the settlement without a hearing, finding it fair, reasonable, and adequate and finding the requested attorney’s fee reasonable. The court also found good cause to excuse the children’s attendance because appearing could cause them distress.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
McInnis v. City of New York · No. 1:24-cv-03449
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
June 3, 2025

Background

Jennifer McInnis brought claims for alleged violations of her and her three children’s Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights against the City of New York, the City Administration for Children’s Services, City employees, and employees of St. Barnabas Hospital. The claims arose from an October 28, 2022 child-neglect investigation.

According to the allegations described in the opinion, O.S. left the family’s apartment after a dispute over a video game and was nearly struck by traffic. An adult sibling scratched O.S.’s neck while helping stop him. At school, O.S. reported that the sibling and McInnis had physically abused him. ACS caseworker Treasure Pray took O.S. to St. Barnabas Hospital without obtaining permission from a parent or guardian. After examining O.S., hospital personnel found no visible injuries consistent with his account and cleared him to return home with McInnis.

Pray later searched McInnis’s home without a court order or warrant and questioned and examined McInnis’s younger children without McInnis’s permission. The investigation was later transferred to another ACS caseworker and was marked unfounded 60 days after the report. The opinion states that the claims against Leah Bralow and Rutmi Goradia had not been settled. McInnis had voluntarily dismissed claims against Jordan Mews and Nyasha Beepot, and ACS was described as an improper defendant because claims against it had to be brought against the City.

Settlement and Required Filings

The City and Pray agreed to pay $100,000 to settle the claims against them. The proposed distribution was:

- $32,833.34 to McInnis; - $32,833.33 to O.S.; - $500 to C.S. (female); - $500 to C.S. (male); and - $33,333.33 to counsel.

McInnis stated that O.S.’s funds would be placed in an interest-bearing account and released over time after he reached age 18. McInnis submitted declarations addressing the required information about the children, the claims, the settlement, and other reimbursement or claims. Attorney Mara Fleder submitted declarations explaining her recommendation of the settlement, the services provided, and her representation of the children’s interests, along with contemporaneous billing records.

Hearing Requirement

Under the applicable federal and New York procedures, an infant settlement generally requires court approval, and the court ordinarily considers whether a hearing is necessary. McInnis stated that requiring the children to attend would be overwhelming and could trigger a behavioral outburst for O.S. The court found that avoiding distress to the children constituted good cause to excuse their attendance.

Fairness of the Settlement

The court evaluated whether the compromise was fair, reasonable, and adequate and whether it protected the children’s best interests. It noted that the settlement resulted from arms’-length negotiations, counsel had experience in similar cases, and paper discovery was substantially complete. The court concluded that the settlement terms were fair, reasonable, and adequate when compared with the likely rewards and risks of continued litigation.

Attorney’s Fee

The proposed fee was one-third of the $100,000 recovery, or $33,333.33. The court found that the requested fee was supported by satisfactory evidence. The billing records showed that Fleder worked 71.57 hours at $400 per hour and Joel Wertheimer worked 1.3 hours at $600 per hour. The court found that the hourly rates and time spent were reasonable for civil-rights lawyers and this type of case.

Disposition

The court approved the Proposed Order without a hearing. It also asked the Clerk of Court to terminate ECF 120. This order approved the settlement involving the City and Pray; it did not terminate the matter as to the non-settling defendants Leah Bralow and Rutmi Goradia.

The authoritative version

Read the full 14-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.