Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 29, 2025

Adams v. The People of the State of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-04543
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Adams v. People: Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

Dimetreus Adams and the defendants, including the People of the State of New York; the action was dismissed, and Adams was denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees.

What happened

Adams v. The People of the State of New York ended with a civil judgment dismissing the action. The judgment says the reasons appeared in an April 25, 2025, order, which is not included here.

The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied Adams permission to appeal without paying the required filing fees.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain entered the judgment on April 29, 2025, dismissing the action and denying fee-free appeal status.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Adams v. The People of the State of New York · No. 1:24-cv-04543
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Apr. 29, 2025

What the judgment says

The civil judgment states that the action brought by Dimetreus Adams against the People of the State of New York and other defendants was dismissed. It gives no explanation of the underlying claims or the dismissal's specific grounds; instead, it refers to an April 25, 2025, order that is not included in the provided text.

Appeal-fee ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. Based on that certification, the court denied Adams permission to appeal without paying the required filing fees. The judgment cites a prior decision explaining that good faith exists when an appellant seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue.

Disposition

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered that the action be dismissed and denied fee-free appeal status. The provided judgment does not state whether the dismissal was based on the merits or on a threshold ground.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.