Kumaran v. ADM Investor Services, Inc.
- Gregory Woods
- 1:20-cv-03873
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Kumaran v. ADM Investor Services, Judge Aaron granted the LLC more time to obtain counsel, stayed its claims, and denied a stay of Kumaran’s individual claims.
Nefertiti Risk Capital Management, LLC must appear through counsel within 14 days after the specified appeal is resolved, and proceedings concerning its claims are stayed. Samantha Siva Kumaran’s individual claims are not stayed and were directed to move forward, with a telephone conference scheduled with ADM Investor Services.
What happened
Kumaran v. ADM Investor Services concerns a request by Samantha Siva Kumaran, acting as client representative of Nefertiti Risk Capital Management, LLC, to extend the time for the LLC to appear through a lawyer. The request followed appeals from the order confirming an arbitration award against the LLC.
The court said the appeal involved the LLC’s claims and therefore the district court no longer had control over those claims. It stayed the case as to the LLC and required the LLC to appear through counsel within 14 days after the appeal was resolved. The court did not stay Kumaran’s individual claims.
Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron granted the extension for the LLC to obtain counsel, denied a stay of Kumaran’s individual claims, and directed Kumaran and ADM Investor Services to attend a telephone conference about those claims.
The detailed version
- Kumaran v. ADM Investor Services, Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-03873
- Gregory Woods
- May 1, 2025
Background
The court considered a letter motion filed by Samantha Siva Kumaran as the client representative of Plaintiff Nefertiti Risk Capital Management, LLC (referred to as “NRCM” in the order). The motion sought more time for NRCM to appear through counsel because the plaintiffs had appealed the court’s order confirming an arbitration award against NRCM.
Rulings
The court granted the motion to the extent it sought more time for NRCM to appear through counsel. The court explained that filing a notice of appeal transfers authority over the appealed issues to the court of appeals and removes the district court’s control over those issues. Because the appeal involved NRCM’s claims, the court stayed this action with respect to NRCM. NRCM must appear through counsel within 14 days after the appeal identified in the order as the “25-805 Appeal” is resolved.
The court denied any request to stay Kumaran’s individual claims. It stated that those claims were not involved in the appeal and should proceed as promptly as practicable. The court directed Kumaran and ADM Investor Services to appear for a telephone conference on May 21, 2025, to discuss the status of Kumaran’s individual claims.
Effect of the Order
The order paused proceedings concerning NRCM while the appeal was pending, except that NRCM received additional time to obtain counsel. It did not pause proceedings concerning Kumaran’s individual claims. This order addressed case management and the effect of the appeal; it did not decide the underlying claims on their merits.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.