Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 1, 2025

Carfora v. Teachers Insurance Annuity Association of America

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:21-cv-08384
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In Carfora v. Teachers Insurance, Judge Failla granted TIAA’s application to keep a confidential exhibit sealed.

Who this affects

TIAA and its clients, whose confidential business and retirement-plan information remains restricted from public access; the plaintiffs and the public cannot view the sealed docket entries.

What happened

In Carfora v. Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, TIAA asked the court to permanently seal an exhibit filed in connection with a motion to dismiss. The plaintiffs took no position on the request.

The exhibit was an Excel spreadsheet containing information about roughly 280 TIAA clients, including client identities, retirement-plan details, marketing-suppression choices, business relationships, and internal marketing categories. TIAA argued that disclosure could harm client privacy and its competitive position.

Judge Katherine Polk Failla granted the application. She directed the clerk to keep docket entries 112 and 115 under seal, available only to the court and the parties, and to terminate the pending motion at docket entry 114.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Carfora v. Teachers Insurance Annuity Association of America · No. 1:21-cv-08384
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
May 1, 2025

Background

TIAA and TIAA-CREF Individual & Institutional Services, LLC, together called “TIAA,” moved to permanently seal Exhibit 1 to a declaration supporting the plaintiffs’ opposition to TIAA’s motion to dismiss. The plaintiffs had filed the exhibit provisionally under seal, and the plaintiffs took no position on TIAA’s request.

Reasons for Sealing

TIAA said Exhibit 1 was an Excel spreadsheet containing information about the retirement plans of approximately 280 current or former clients. The information covered 11 years and included client identities, marketing-suppression selections and dates, recordkeeping structures, the status of TIAA’s relationships with clients, and TIAA’s internal client categorization and segmentation information.

TIAA argued that the exhibit contained confidential information belonging to TIAA and its clients. It asserted that public disclosure could harm client privacy, damage TIAA’s business relationships, and give competitors information they could use to target TIAA’s clients or learn about its marketing practices. TIAA relied on the presumption of public access to court documents and the recognized exceptions for privacy interests and competitively sensitive business information.

Ruling

Judge Katherine Polk Failla granted the application. The clerk was directed to maintain docket entries 112 and 115 under seal, viewable only by the court and the parties. The clerk was also directed to terminate the pending motion at docket entry 114.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.