Silver Bow Trust U/T/A v. Verde Mobility, Inc.
- Laura Provinzino
- 0:24-cv-04271
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 15
In Silver Bow Trust v. Verde Mobility, Judge Provinzino granted in part and denied in part Silver Bow’s default-judgment motion.
Silver Bow Trust U/T/A obtained default judgment on its breach-of-contract claims against Verde Mobility, Inc. and Michael Luther. The defendants were ordered to be jointly and severally liable for $129,661.37 in damages, $11,225.50 in attorneys’ fees, and $513.86 in costs; Silver Bow’s alternative unjust-enrichment claim was denied.
What happened
Silver Bow Trust U/T/A sued Verde Mobility, Inc. and Michael Luther over an unpaid $85,000 loan, a $10,000 one-time fee, interest, and Luther’s personal guarantee. Neither defendant answered the amended complaint or responded to the motion for default judgment.
The court found that Silver Bow established valid breach-of-contract claims against Verde and Luther. It rejected the alternative unjust-enrichment claim because valid contracts governed the parties’ rights and obligations.
Judge Laura M. Provinzino entered default judgment for $129,661.37 in damages, $11,225.50 in attorneys’ fees, and $513.86 in costs. Verde and Luther are jointly and severally liable for each amount, meaning Silver Bow may recover the full amount from either defendant, subject to the rules governing such liability.
The detailed version
- Silver Bow Trust U/T/A v. Verde Mobility, Inc. · No. 0:24-cv-04271
- Laura M. Provinzino
- May 6, 2025
Background
Silver Bow Trust U/T/A asserted breach-of-contract and alternative unjust-enrichment claims against Verde Mobility, Inc. and Michael Luther. The claims arose from a promissory note that required Verde to pay $85,000 in principal and a $10,000 one-time fee by December 31, 2022. The note provided for interest on unpaid principal, increasing from 14% per year to 18% per year after default, and allowed recovery of reasonable attorneys’ fees and court costs incurred to enforce the note.
Luther signed the note for Verde and separately signed a personal guaranty. The guaranty made him jointly and severally responsible with Verde for the amount due after Verde’s default. The defendants made no payments by the maturity date. Silver Bow sent a written default notice and made additional demands, but the defendants did not pay.
Procedural History
Silver Bow filed its amended complaint on December 16,
- The defendants were served on January 8, 2025, and their responses were due January 29,
- Neither defendant answered or otherwise responded. The Clerk of Court entered default against both defendants on February 18,
- Silver Bow then moved for default judgment and attorneys’ fees and costs. The defendants did not respond to that motion.
Default Judgment
The court held that the motion was procedurally proper under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55. Although default generally admits the complaint’s factual allegations, the court still had to determine whether those facts established valid claims and supported the requested damages.
The court found that Silver Bow established breach-of-contract claims against Verde and Luther. It concluded that Verde breached the note by failing to pay and that Luther breached the guaranty by failing to satisfy Verde’s obligation. The court awarded $129,661.37 in actual damages, consisting of the $85,000 principal, the $10,000 one-time fee, and $34,661.37 in accrued interest. Verde and Luther are jointly and severally liable for that amount.
The court denied default judgment on Silver Bow’s alternative unjust-enrichment claim. It reasoned that unjust enrichment is an equitable claim and cannot provide relief when valid contracts govern the parties’ rights and obligations.
Attorneys’ Fees and Costs
The note required the defendants to pay reasonable attorneys’ fees and court costs associated with collection and enforcement. Silver Bow requested $14,213.50 in attorneys’ fees and $513.86 in costs. The court found the costs reasonable and awarded the full $513.86.
The court found the requested attorneys’ fees generally reasonable but reduced them by $2,988. That reduction covered work on amended complaints filed to address jurisdictional pleading defects, rather than work collecting the debt under the note. The court therefore awarded $11,225.50 in attorneys’ fees. Verde and Luther are jointly and severally liable for both the fees and costs.
Order
The court expressly granted in part and denied in part Silver Bow’s motion for default judgment and award of attorneys’ fees and costs. It granted default judgment on the breach-of-contract claims, denied it on the alternative unjust-enrichment claim, awarded $129,661.37 in damages, $11,225.50 in attorneys’ fees, and $513.86 in costs, and directed that judgment be entered.
Read the full 15-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.