Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 6, 2025

Global Media Network v. Tidal

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-00396
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Global Media Network v. Tidal, Judge Swain denied reinstatement because Global Media Network neither paid filing fees nor filed an IFP application.

Who this affects

Global Media Network’s request to reinstate its action was denied, while the earlier dismissal without prejudice remained in place. The order also denied permission to appeal without paying fees.

What happened

Global Media Network sued Tidal but did not pay the required civil filing fees or submit an application to proceed without paying them. The court gave Global Media Network 30 days to do one of those things, but it did neither.

The court then dismissed the action without prejudice, and the Clerk entered judgment. Global Media Network later asked to reinstate the case, saying it believed it had until May 5, 2025, to submit the application, but it did not attach an application to its request.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain denied the request to reinstate the case. She also ruled that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Global Media Network v. Tidal · No. 1:25-cv-00396
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 6, 2025

Background

Global Media Network filed this action without paying the $405 filing fee required for a civil action and without submitting an application to proceed without paying the fee. On February 3, 2025, the court gave Global Media Network 30 days to pay the fee or submit the application. It did neither.

On March 20, 2025, the court dismissed the action without prejudice. The Clerk of Court entered judgment on March 21, 2025. Global Media Network later sent a letter asking the court to “reinstate [the] case.” It said that it believed it had until May 5, 2025, to file an application to proceed without paying the fee, but it did not attach that application.

Ruling

Judge Laura Taylor Swain denied Global Media Network’s request to reinstate the case. The order did not change the earlier dismissal without prejudice. The court noted that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allow a party to seek reconsideration of an order or judgment for specified reasons, including mistake, excusable neglect, newly discovered evidence, misconduct, a void judgment, satisfaction of the judgment, or another reason justifying relief. The order states that a party seeking reconsideration of the dismissal must comply with Rule 60(b) and provide a reason for reconsideration.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to appeal without paying the required fees.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.