Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 9, 2025

Lord v. New York City

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-01193
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Lord v. New York City, Judge Swain dismissed Don Lord’s action without prejudice after he failed to update his address as ordered.

Who this affects

Don Lord’s action against the City of New York and other defendants was dismissed without prejudice; the court also denied fee-free appeal status.

What happened

In Lord v. New York City, Don Lord sued the City of New York and other defendants. The opinion does not describe the claims’ underlying facts.

The court had ordered Lord to keep his address and electronic contact information current. After he failed to update his address, the court gave him 30 days to explain why the action should not be dismissed, but he did not respond or otherwise contact the court.

Judge Swain dismissed the action under Rule 41(b) for failing to follow the court’s standing order. The dismissal was without prejudice to Lord filing a new civil action. The court also denied him permission to appeal without paying fees and directed the clerk to enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lord v. New York City · No. 1:25-cv-01193
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 9, 2025

Background

Don Lord brought this action against the City of New York and other defendants. The opinion does not state the substance of his claims.

A March 18, 2024 standing order required self-represented litigants to tell the court about changes to their address or electronic contact information. On April 4, 2025, the court ordered Lord to show cause within 30 days why the action should not be dismissed without prejudice because he had not updated his address as required.

Court’s Ruling

Lord did not update his address and did not otherwise communicate with the court. The court therefore dismissed the action under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failing to comply with the standing order. The dismissal was without prejudice to Lord’s filing a new civil action.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees. The court directed the clerk to enter judgment. Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.