Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 13, 2025

Pettigrew v. BAYVIEW SOLUTIONS LLC

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:25-cv-02616
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Davy Pettigrew v. Bayview Solutions LLC, Judge Ricardo ordered U.S. Marshals service after Pettigrew supplied a corrected address.

Who this affects

Davy Pettigrew and Bayview Solutions LLC; the Clerk of Court and U.S. Marshals Service were directed to take steps to serve Bayview.

What happened

Davy Pettigrew sued Bayview Solutions LLC, alleging that it accessed his Experian consumer report without a legally permitted purpose under federal credit-reporting and debt-collection laws and New York law. Pettigrew is representing himself and was allowed to proceed without paying court fees upfront.

After Pettigrew provided a corrected service address and filed an amended complaint, the court directed the Clerk to prepare an amended summons and the required service paperwork. The U.S. Marshals Service must use those materials to serve Bayview.

Judge Henry J. Ricardo ordered that service occur within 90 days after the amended summons is issued, and said Pettigrew should request more time if needed. The order addressed service only and did not decide whether Pettigrew’s claims are legally valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Pettigrew v. BAYVIEW SOLUTIONS LLC · No. 1:25-cv-02616
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
May 13, 2025

Background

Davy Pettigrew, who is representing himself, brought claims under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and New York General Business Law § 349. He alleges that Bayview Solutions LLC accessed his Experian consumer report without a permissible purpose.

The court had previously allowed Pettigrew to proceed without prepaying filing fees. Because he was proceeding without prepaying fees, he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve Bayview. Pettigrew later notified the court that he had obtained a corrected address for service and filed an amended complaint containing that address.

Order

The court instructed the Clerk of Court to issue an amended summons for Bayview, complete the U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form with Bayview’s service address, and deliver the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. The order identified the service address as Bayview Solutions, LLC, care of Registered Agent Solutions, Inc., at 2894 Remington Green Lane, Suite A, Tallahassee, Florida 32308.

The court stated that Pettigrew should request an extension if the complaint is not served within 90 days after the summons is issued. It also directed Pettigrew to notify the court in writing if his address changes and warned that the action may be dismissed if he fails to do so.

Disposition and Significance

The court entered an order directing service of the amended summons and related documents through the U.S. Marshals Service. It did not rule on the merits of Pettigrew’s claims or determine whether Bayview violated any law. Judge Henry J. Ricardo signed the order as a United States magistrate judge.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.