Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled May 14, 2025

Silloway v. City and County of San Francisco

Judge
Richard Seeborg
Docket
3:20-cv-07400
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
DiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Silloway v. City and County of San Francisco, Magistrate Judge Tse ordered CCSF to produce records about deferred holiday pay.

Who this affects

The named and opt-in plaintiffs and the City and County of San Francisco, because the order requires CCSF to produce specified payroll, pay-deferral, and policy records.

What happened

In Silloway v. City and County of San Francisco, plaintiffs sought records about a payroll code created for unpaid time that staff nurses deferred from holiday hours.

The court found the records relevant to whether the nurses were exempt from overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act and ordered the City and County of San Francisco to produce them by June 13, 2025.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse said CCSF did not show that the burden of producing the records outweighed their likely benefit; CCSF need not reproduce documents it had already produced.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Silloway v. City and County of San Francisco · No. 3:20-cv-07400
Judge
Richard Seeborg
Date
May 14, 2025

Background

This was a discovery order concerning staff nurses’ unpaid time and overtime claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. According to the City and County of San Francisco (CCSF), staff nurses sometimes asked the payroll department not to pay them for certain holiday-related hours and to defer using those hours until later. CCSF’s payroll system had no existing code for those situations, so its experts created a post hoc “Voluntary Leave Without Pay” code to account for them in this litigation.

What the Plaintiffs Sought

The plaintiffs sought documents showing when named plaintiffs or opt-in plaintiffs requested, or CCSF approved, pay deferrals for holiday-related hours during the relevant period. They also sought documents concerning any CCSF policy or practice for processing those requests. The court said the records could help determine whether unpaid time resulted from CCSF’s actions, such as cutting shifts or pay, or from nurses’ requests to defer holiday pay. That distinction was relevant to whether the nurses qualified as professionals exempt from Fair Labor Standards Act overtime requirements.

Ruling

Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse ordered CCSF to produce, by June 13, 2025, all documents within those categories. The court held that the discovery was relevant to the claims and defenses and that CCSF had not shown that its burden or expense outweighed the likely benefit. The order covered relevant documents even if CCSF’s experts did not rely, or did not plan to rely, on them. CCSF did not have to reproduce documents it had already produced, but it had to produce any other documents within the order’s scope.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.