Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 14, 2025

Kirkland v. The People of the State of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-03812
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Kirkland v. The People of the State of New York, Judge Swain ordered Kirkland to pay fees or amend his request to proceed without prepaying fees within 30 days.

Who this affects

Tarence Kirkland, who must either pay $405 in fees or submit an amended application to proceed without prepaying fees within 30 days. The action may be dismissed if he does not comply.

What happened

In Kirkland v. The People of the State of New York, Tarence Kirkland filed a civil action without a lawyer and submitted an application asking to proceed without paying court fees up front. His application said he had no income or money in a bank account and no expenses, but did not explain how he paid for food or housing.

The court ordered Kirkland, within 30 days, either to pay $405 in filing and administrative fees or submit an amended application with more facts about his financial circumstances. The court said no summons would issue at that time and warned that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal, certifying that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Kirkland v. The People of the State of New York · No. 1:25-cv-03812
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 14, 2025

Background

Tarence Kirkland brought this civil action without a lawyer. To proceed in the case, he had to either pay $405 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee—or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Kirkland submitted an application to proceed without prepaying fees. The application stated that he had no source of income and no money in a bank account. It listed his expenses as “none,” but did not explain how he was able to eat or pay housing expenses. The court therefore could not determine whether he was able to pay the required fees.

Order

The court ordered Kirkland, within 30 days of May 14, 2025, to do one of two things: pay the $405 in fees or submit an amended application. The amended application had to provide facts establishing that he could not pay the filing fees and include docket number 25-CV-3812 (LTS). If the court grants the amended application, Kirkland may proceed without paying the fees in advance.

No summons would issue at that time. The court stated that, if Kirkland complied with the order, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office’s procedures. If he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Appeal and disposition

Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. The court therefore denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. The order addressed the filing-fee application and did not decide the merits of Kirkland’s underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.