Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 14, 2025

Friedeberg v. USA Today

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-09106
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Friedeberg v. USA Today, Judge Swain granted Donna Friedeberg’s request to withdraw and voluntarily dismissed the complaint.

Who this affects

Donna Friedeberg’s complaint was voluntarily dismissed at her request; the order also denied fee-free status for any appeal.

What happened

In Friedeberg v. USA Today, Donna Friedeberg sent the court a letter saying that she wanted to withdraw her complaint.

The court granted her request and voluntarily dismissed the action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). The order does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free appeal status. The clerk was directed to mail the order to Friedeberg and record service on the docket.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Friedeberg v. USA Today · No. 1:24-cv-09106
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 14, 2025

Background

Donna Friedeberg submitted a March 7, 2025 letter stating that she wanted to withdraw her complaint against USA Today and the other named defendants.

Ruling

The court granted Friedeberg’s request to withdraw the action. It voluntarily dismissed the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). The order does not specify whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied fee-free appeal status. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail a copy of the order to Friedeberg and note service on the docket.

Disposition

Judge Laura Taylor Swain granted the request to withdraw the action and voluntarily dismissed the complaint. The order also denied fee-free status for an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.