Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 19, 2025

Nurture, LLC v. PBM Nutritionals LLC

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:24-cv-02390
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
DiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Nurture, LLC v. PBM Nutritionals LLC, Judge Failla stayed discovery deadlines while the parties pursued private mediation.

Who this affects

Nurture, LLC and PBM Nutritionals LLC, whose discovery deadlines were stayed and whose post-fact-discovery conference was postponed.

What happened

Nurture, LLC v. PBM Nutritionals LLC concerns the parties’ joint request to pause the case schedule while they tried to resolve their dispute through private mediation.

The parties said they had selected a mediator and expected mediation during the week of July 14, 2025. They asked to postpone discovery deadlines and proposed new dates if the case did not settle.

Judge Katherine Polk Failla stayed the discovery deadlines until further order, approved the proposed amended case-management plan separately, and moved the post-discovery conference to November 6, 2025. She ordered the parties to report within one week after mediation whether they had reached a resolution and said no further extension requests would be granted.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Nurture, LLC v. PBM Nutritionals LLC · No. 1:24-cv-02390
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
May 19, 2025

Background

Nurture, LLC and PBM Nutritionals LLC jointly asked the court to temporarily pause deadlines in the case-management and scheduling order so they could pursue private mediation. The parties said this was their third request for an adjournment and that their earlier requests had been granted. They reported that document discovery was substantially complete and that expert disclosures had recently been exchanged.

The parties anticipated holding mediation during the week of July 14, 2025. They proposed postponing fact and expert discovery deadlines, including deadlines for depositions, requests for admission, expert reports, and responses to requests for admission. They also agreed that, if the case did not resolve, fact-witness depositions would be completed by October 17, 2025.

Court’s Action

The court STAYED the discovery deadlines in the action pending further order. It endorsed the parties’ proposed amended case-management plan under separate cover. The parties were ORDERED to file a joint letter within one week after their private mediation stating whether they had reached a resolution.

The court also ADJOURNED the post-fact-discovery conference from August 7, 2025, to November 6, 2025, at 11:00 a.m. Judge Katherine Polk Failla stated that, given the stay and the substantial extension of discovery deadlines, the court would grant no further extension requests. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate the pending motion at docket entry 69. The order did not decide the merits of the parties’ underlying dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.