Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 16, 2025

Compres v. Doe

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-02259
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Compres v. Doe, Chief Judge Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice because Compres neither completed the required forms nor paid filing fees.

Who this affects

Angel Compres, whose complaint was dismissed without prejudice for failing to submit the required filing-fee documents or pay the filing fees; permission to appeal without paying fees was also denied.

What happened

In Compres v. Doe, the court required Angel Compres to submit a completed application to proceed without paying filing fees and a prisoner authorization, or to pay the $405 filing fees.

The court had warned that failing to comply within thirty days would result in dismissal. Compres did not submit the required documents or pay the fees.

The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice and directed the Clerk to enter judgment. Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied permission to appeal without paying fees, finding that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Compres v. Doe · No. 1:25-cv-02259
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 16, 2025

Background

On March 25, 2025, the court ordered Angel Compres to do one of two things within thirty days: submit a completed application to proceed without paying filing fees and a prisoner authorization, or pay the $405 required to file a civil action. The order warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal.

Compres did not submit the application and authorization and did not pay the filing fees.

Ruling

The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying fees. The court directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment. The order did not address the merits of the complaint.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.