Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 22, 2025

Arias v. HPD

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-04171
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Arias v. HPD, Judge Swain ordered payment or an amended fee-waiver application within 30 days, or dismissal would follow.

Who this affects

Justo Arias must either pay the required fees or submit an amended application with additional financial information within 30 days; the action will be dismissed if he does not comply.

What happened

In Arias v. HPD, Justo Arias brought the action without a lawyer and asked to proceed without paying the court fees upfront. The court said a plaintiff must either pay $405 or submit information showing inability to pay.

Arias reported that he was employed and earned $7,200 per month, but he left unanswered questions about other income, money in accounts, property, living expenses, dependents, debts, and financial obligations. The court therefore could not decide whether he could afford the fees.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered Arias, within 30 days of May 22, 2025, to pay $405 or submit an amended application with the missing information. No summons would issue at that time, and the action would be dismissed if he did not comply. The court also denied fee-waiver status for any appeal from the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Arias v. HPD · No. 1:25-cv-04171
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 22, 2025

Background

Justo Arias brought this action without a lawyer. To proceed with a civil case in the Southern District of New York, a plaintiff must either pay the required fees or apply to proceed without prepaying them. Arias submitted an application to proceed without prepaying fees, commonly called an IFP application.

Deficiencies in the Application

Arias stated that he was employed and earned $7,200 per month. He also indicated that he had other income but did not identify its source or amount. He did not provide the amounts of money in cash or in checking or savings accounts, information about property he owned and its value, monthly living expenses, dependents, debts, or other financial obligations. Because of these omissions, the court could not conclusively determine whether Arias was unable to pay the filing fees. The court noted that his stated monthly income suggested that he might be able to pay them.

Order

The court ordered Arias, within 30 days of the order, to either pay $405 in filing and administrative fees or submit an amended IFP application. The amended application must use docket number 25-CV-4171 (LTS) and provide facts showing that he cannot afford the fees. If the court grants the amended application, Arias may proceed without prepaying the fees.

No summons would issue at that time. If Arias complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed. The court also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal. The order did not address the merits of Arias’s claims against HPD.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.