Arias v. HPD
- Laura Swain
- 1:25-cv-04171
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Arias v. HPD, Judge Swain ordered payment or an amended fee-waiver application within 30 days, or dismissal would follow.
Justo Arias must either pay the required fees or submit an amended application with additional financial information within 30 days; the action will be dismissed if he does not comply.
What happened
In Arias v. HPD, Justo Arias brought the action without a lawyer and asked to proceed without paying the court fees upfront. The court said a plaintiff must either pay $405 or submit information showing inability to pay.
Arias reported that he was employed and earned $7,200 per month, but he left unanswered questions about other income, money in accounts, property, living expenses, dependents, debts, and financial obligations. The court therefore could not decide whether he could afford the fees.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered Arias, within 30 days of May 22, 2025, to pay $405 or submit an amended application with the missing information. No summons would issue at that time, and the action would be dismissed if he did not comply. The court also denied fee-waiver status for any appeal from the order.
The detailed version
- Arias v. HPD · No. 1:25-cv-04171
- Laura Swain
- May 22, 2025
Background
Justo Arias brought this action without a lawyer. To proceed with a civil case in the Southern District of New York, a plaintiff must either pay the required fees or apply to proceed without prepaying them. Arias submitted an application to proceed without prepaying fees, commonly called an IFP application.
Deficiencies in the Application
Arias stated that he was employed and earned $7,200 per month. He also indicated that he had other income but did not identify its source or amount. He did not provide the amounts of money in cash or in checking or savings accounts, information about property he owned and its value, monthly living expenses, dependents, debts, or other financial obligations. Because of these omissions, the court could not conclusively determine whether Arias was unable to pay the filing fees. The court noted that his stated monthly income suggested that he might be able to pay them.
Order
The court ordered Arias, within 30 days of the order, to either pay $405 in filing and administrative fees or submit an amended IFP application. The amended application must use docket number 25-CV-4171 (LTS) and provide facts showing that he cannot afford the fees. If the court grants the amended application, Arias may proceed without prepaying the fees.
No summons would issue at that time. If Arias complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed. The court also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal. The order did not address the merits of Arias’s claims against HPD.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.