Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 22, 2025

Mallgren v. United States

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-04266
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Mallgren v. United States, Chief Judge Swain dismissed the action without prejudice after Mallgren failed to seek required permission to proceed without paying filing fees.

Who this affects

Mallgren’s action was dismissed without prejudice. The United States and American Doctors (Male) were defendants in the dismissed action. The court also denied Mallgren permission to proceed without paying fees on appeal.

What happened

In Mallgren v. United States, Mallgren filed a new civil action without paying the filing fees. The court treated this as an attempt to proceed without paying because he did not pay those fees.

A 2016 order had barred Mallgren from filing future civil actions in that court without paying fees unless he first obtained the court’s permission. Mallgren did not request that permission before filing this action.

The court dismissed the action without prejudice because Mallgren did not comply with the earlier filing restriction, Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain ruled. The court also denied permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal and directed the Clerk to enter a civil judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mallgren v. United States · No. 1:25-cv-04266
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 22, 2025

Background

In an earlier round of this case, the court entered a filing injunction in 2016. The injunction barred Mallgren from filing any future civil action in the Southern District of New York without paying filing fees unless he first obtained the court’s permission. The earlier order imposed that restriction because of Mallgren’s history of litigation that the court described as frivolous, vexatious, or otherwise lacking merit in that court and other federal courts.

Mallgren filed this new action against the United States and American Doctors (Male). He did not pay the fees required to start the action and did not ask for permission to file it under the earlier injunction. The court therefore assumed that he sought to proceed without paying filing fees.

Ruling

The court dismissed the action without prejudice for failure to comply with the earlier filing injunction. This was a procedural dismissal based on Mallgren’s failure to obtain the required permission; the order did not address the merits of his claims.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for purposes of an appeal. It directed the Clerk of Court to enter a civil judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.