Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 27, 2025

Yzaguirre v. Levin

Judge
James Oetken
Docket
1:24-cv-01500
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Yzaguirre v. Levin, Judge Oetken granted Yzaguirre permission to proceed without prepaying fees on appeal.

Who this affects

Jace R. Yzaguirre, who was permitted to proceed without prepaying fees on appeal.

What happened

Yzaguirre v. Levin involved Jace Yzaguirre’s request to proceed without prepaying court fees while appealing to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Yzaguirre argued that his prior permission to proceed without fees in state court meant he did not need to submit a federal affidavit or sworn declaration. The court rejected that interpretation but considered his statements that he was unemployed and had no assets.

Judge J. Paul Oetken ruled that those statements satisfied the federal requirements and granted Yzaguirre’s request to proceed without prepaying fees on appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Yzaguirre v. Levin · No. 1:24-cv-01500
Judge
James Oetken
Date
May 27, 2025

Background

Pro se plaintiff Jace R. Yzaguirre asked the court for permission to maintain his status as a person allowed to proceed without prepaying court fees in his appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The court noted that Yzaguirre had not previously been authorized to proceed without prepaying fees in federal court and directed him to submit an affidavit or sworn declaration meeting Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(1).

Yzaguirre responded that he did not need to submit those materials because he had received permission to proceed without prepaying fees in the state court from which this action had been removed. The court stated that this was not a correct reading of the federal rules.

Court’s Analysis

The court nevertheless treated Yzaguirre’s submissions as satisfying Rule 24(a)(1). Those submissions indicated that he was unemployed and had no assets. The court also cited 28 U.S.C. § 1746(1), which permits sworn declarations to be used instead of affidavits, and a Second Circuit decision concerning acceptance of a substantially compliant declaration from a self-represented litigant.

Ruling

Judge J. Paul Oetken granted Yzaguirre’s request to proceed without prepaying fees on appeal. The order did not state any additional disposition of the case or appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.