Gilberti PE v. Holy See
- Laura Swain
- 1:24-cv-09107
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 7
Gilberti PE v. Holy See: Chief Judge Swain dismissed the frivolous action and denied a stay motion as moot.
Joseph D. Gilberti PE and the approximately 213 defendants named in his action were affected. The action was dismissed, and his motion to stay various Florida state-court cases was denied as moot.
What happened
In Joseph D. Gilberti PE v. Holy See, Joseph D. Gilberti PE, representing himself, sued about 213 defendants and alleged a broad conspiracy involving a hidden underground resource and attacks on him and others.
The court screened the complaint because Gilberti had permission to proceed without paying fees in advance. It found that the allegations lacked plausible factual support and were irrational, so the court dismissed the action as frivolous and declined to allow an amended complaint.
Chief Judge Swain also denied Gilberti’s motion to stay various Florida state-court cases as moot, denied permission to proceed without advance fees for an appeal, terminated the pending motions, and directed entry of judgment.
The detailed version
- Gilberti PE v. Holy See · No. 1:24-cv-09107
- Laura Swain
- May 27, 2025
Background
Joseph D. Gilberti PE, who was being held at the Sarasota County Jail in Sarasota, Florida, brought the action without a lawyer. He sued approximately 213 defendants, including government officials and entities, judges, companies, religious organizations, educational institutions, media organizations, and others. The opinion lists the defendants but does not identify a specific legal cause of action for each claim.
Gilberti’s 236-page complaint alleged that he had discovered a hidden underground natural resource involving medicine, energy, and water production. He alleged that the defendants were involved in a widespread racketeering conspiracy to conceal the resource, attack him and his family, interfere with his property and business, and harm the public, the environment, and the economy. The complaint also referred to alleged violations of several constitutional amendments and sought relief including water-supply evaluations, investigations, arrests, and reports.
Screening standard
The court had previously allowed Gilberti to proceed without paying the filing fee in advance. Under federal law, the court must screen such a prisoner’s complaint and dismiss it, or any part of it, if it is frivolous, fails to state a claim, seeks money from an immune defendant, or falls outside the court’s jurisdiction. A claim is frivolous when it lacks an arguable legal or factual basis. Although courts read filings by people without lawyers generously, those filings must still provide a short and plain statement showing an entitlement to relief.
Court’s analysis
The court held that the complaint did not plausibly support Gilberti’s allegations of a widespread conspiracy to attack him and his family, conceal “secret underground oceans,” and terrorize or sicken the public. It concluded that the allegations were irrational and therefore frivolous. The court stated that Gilberti’s beliefs, no matter how strongly held, were not facts.
The court also concluded that the defects could not be cured by allowing Gilberti to amend the complaint. It therefore declined to grant leave to amend.
Rulings
The court dismissed the action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without advance fees for purposes of an appeal. The court denied Gilberti’s motion to stay various Florida state-court cases as moot, directed the clerk to terminate all pending motions, and directed the clerk to enter judgment.
Read the full 7-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.