Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 28, 2025

Mallgren v. United States

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-04238
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Mallgren v. United States: New York City, Judge Swain dismissed the action and certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

Who this affects

Anthony Brian Mallgren’s action against the United States: New York City was dismissed. The judgment also contains a certification concerning any appeal.

What happened

In Mallgren v. United States, Anthony Brian Mallgren brought an action against the United States: New York City. The judgment says the action was dismissed for the reasons given in a May 22, 2025, order.

The judgment does not describe the claims, the parties’ arguments, or the reasons for dismissal. The May 22 order is not included in the provided opinion text.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain entered the judgment on May 28, 2025. She also certified under federal law that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mallgren v. United States · No. 1:25-cv-04238
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 28, 2025

Background

The caption identifies Anthony Brian Mallgren as the plaintiff and “UNITED STATES: NEW YORK CITY” as the defendants. The court’s judgment states that the action was dismissed for the reasons stated in a May 22, 2025, order.

What the Judgment Says

The provided text does not include the May 22 order. As a result, it does not identify the claims, the parties’ positions, or the court’s stated basis for dismissal. The judgment itself does not explain whether the dismissal was based on a procedural issue or on the merits.

Ruling

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the action. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. The judgment does not state any additional terms concerning dismissal or appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.